

The Client Profile is designed to run client applications and to enable the fastest possible deployment for Windows Presentation Foundation (WPF) and Windows Forms technology. NET Framework 4 Client Profile provides a subset of features from the. If you disable OV, there is NO speed improvement.So i fail to understand how topaz claims there is a MASSIVE speed improvement, when there is NONE.Īll this is evident from the logs for anyone to see.The Microsoft. The speed noticed by many is only due to OV models, as OV option is not present anymore to disable it. I have tried OV, TF models with different block sizes and the newer 5.5.0 produces less detail and less sharpness compared to the previous version 5.4.5 models. The new version 5.5.0 even with ONLY CPU model ggn-v1-fp32-192x192-tf or ggn-v1-fp32-384x384-tf produces less detailed and blurry image compared to the CPU only (giga.tz) model of 5.4.5. Don’t know why anyone would want to use it. OV does not produce a sharp detailed image which is what is required in a up scaling photo software. But the same speed can be achieved in previous versions. This is not necessarily a bad thing as it depends on the requirements of the user. So OV on makes image worse in quality but increases speed. i.e image quality is similar to OV ON in version 5.4.5.Īnyone can make these observations with given model file above. Image quality with less sharpness overall.Almost same time taken with OV on in previous version of 5.4.5.Changed block size to 384x384, no difference noticed.Lots of parts have blurriness with ggn-v1-fp32-192x192 as compared to the 5.4.5.Time taken to process is same as time taken in version 5.4.5 CPU mode.This uses only CPU and block size of 192x192 from the logs. So i understand that the 192x192 or 384x384 is the block size. I also checked that 5.5 models are the same that the models in beta.I’m downloading all models, thanks for the share, but 17 Go will take me at least a day, I don’t know if I’ll succeed. The only thing I didn’t know yet is to check that *-tf.tz models produce blurry results.Let’s say that 80% areas I checked are better now. : I tried with a single picture, a cartoon in CGI and I can say this : by comparison with the same picture done in CPU only, sometimes old model is better, but most of the time new model is better, frankly.Yes the results are different, and yes I disabled “model downloading” so I just have models packed with the installer.I re-installed 5.3.2, one of the last builds where I’m sure that I can use CPU only, as we can manage this in preferences. You have played around in the folder of the model files.
